Apexthrust
Technology

The hidden cost of letting AI make your life easier

February 26, 2026 • 5 min read • views
The hidden cost of letting AI make your life easier
Big Think Home Open search Open main menu
  • Search What are you curious about? Popular SearchesCritical thinkingPhilosophyEmotional IntelligenceFree Will Latest Videos Latest Articles
  • Topics

    Philosophy

    • Ethics
    • Religion
    • Flourishing
    • Knowledge
    • Philosophy of Science
    • Philosophy of Art
    • Language
    • Political Theory
    • Identity
    • Meaning & Purpose

    Science & Tech

    • Physics
    • Biology
    • Aerospace
    • Health
    • Geology
    • Computing
    • Engineering
    • Energy
    • Biotechnology
    • Astronomy

    Mind & Behavior

    • Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Decision-Making
    • Mental Health
    • Consciousness
    • Emotional Intelligence
    • Personality
    • Relationships
    • Parenting

    Business

    • Entrepreneurship
    • Leadership
    • Finance
    • Marketing
    • Innovation
    • Strategy
    • Management
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Startups
    • Economics

    History & Society

    • History
    • Literature
    • Art
    • Music
    • Film
    • Progress
    • Culture
    • Sociology
    • Policy
    • Geopolitics
  • Latest
  • Videos Latest Videos A man in a red shirt and gray pants sits on a chair in front of a white backdrop in a modern, brick-walled room with large windows. How experimental archaeologists are resurrecting our forgotten past with Sam Kean A bald man wearing a dark sweater sits against a plain white background, looking slightly to the side with a neutral expression. Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations with Alain de Botton A woman with flowers in her hair holds a white mask near her face and smiles, wearing a ruffled pink collar. Why toxic positivity is making us miserable with Kate Bowler A person sits on a chair in front of a white backdrop in a spacious, brick-walled studio with wooden floors and various furniture. Why healthy love feels uncomfortable to so many people with Alain de Botton A collage shows an aerial view of a green planet above images of Indigenous people, some in traditional attire, participating in a gathering or march. Indigenous leadership is essential to climate action. Here’s why. with Skoll Foundation A man in glasses and a suit jacket sits indoors, gesturing with his right hand. Exposed brick walls, a window, and a lamp are visible in the background. The tiny transistors remaking our global order with Chris Miller See All
  • Columns MINI PHILOSOPHY with Jonny Thomson" text on black background with icons of pathways, scales, and a bird. Mini Philosophy A philosophy column for personal reflection. X-ray galactic center Starts With A Bang An astrophysics column on big questions and our universe. A black background with the symbols "B | T" in a box on the left and the word "BOOKS" on the right, with the first "O" replaced by an open book icon. Books A literature column to feed your curiosity. Abstract image featuring a human silhouette filled with various medical and neural diagrams, with brain scan images in the background. A small figure is walking towards the center, symbolizing the long game. The Long Game A business column on long-term thinking. Strange Maps A geography column on history and society. The Well A collection of essays and videos on life’s biggest questions. 13.8 A column at the intersection of science and culture.
  • Classes Featured Classes A Venn diagram with three overlapping circles showing a person's face, a handshake, and a waveform on a green background. Members 5 videos The Humanity of Leadership Simon Sinek Ethnographer and author A collage featuring climbers helping each other, a pink compass rose, and a smiling man in a suit, all with a muted color palette. Members 7 videos How to Lead With Integrity Steve Stoute Founder and CEO, UnitedMasters and Translation A grayscale photo of a woman with hoop earrings, set against an orange background and overlaid on a black and white abstract digital pattern. Members 6 videos Transform Your Organization with AI Daphne Koller Founder and CEO of insitro. A bald man wearing a dark blazer and black shirt smiles slightly against a plain light gray background. Members 10 videos Unlocking Your Team’s Hidden Potential Adam Grant Organizational psychologist and author A four-panel image: a serving tray, a key symbol, a smiley face, and a smiling man in the bottom right corner. The colors are muted purple and beige. Members 6 videos The Secrets of Unreasonable Hospitality Will Guidara Restaurateur and Author, Unreasonable Hospitality A red-tinted image of a woman’s face is overlaid inside the shape of a purse, set against a black and yellow grid background. Members 12 videos How to Afford Anything Paula Pant Host, Afford Anything Podcast, Afford Anything Browse
  • More
    • Newsletters
    • Monthly Issues
    • Events
    • Big Think+ Learning
    • Creative Studio
    • Advertise with Us
    • About
    • Careers
    • View our Twitter (X) feed View our Youtube channel View our Instagram feed View our Substack feed
Sign In Membership
  • My account
    • My Classes
    • My Account
    • My List
    • Early Releases
    • Sign Out
  • Membership
  • Latest
  • Topics Back
  • Videos Back Latest Videos A man in a red shirt and gray pants sits on a chair in front of a white backdrop in a modern, brick-walled room with large windows. How experimental archaeologists are resurrecting our forgotten past Sam Kean examines how rogue archaeologists are recreating the sounds, tastes, smells, and practices of the ancient past. A bald man wearing a dark sweater sits against a plain white background, looking slightly to the side with a neutral expression. Why relationships in 2026 carry impossible expectations Now that love has been liberated, it seems to have become more complicated and more illusive than ever. Alain de... A woman with flowers in her hair holds a white mask near her face and smiles, wearing a ruffled pink collar. Why toxic positivity is making us miserable Toxic positivity isn’t optimism. It’s denial. Historian Kate Bowler explains why our obsession with “good vibes only” is making it... A person sits on a chair in front of a white backdrop in a spacious, brick-walled studio with wooden floors and various furniture. Why healthy love feels uncomfortable to so many people Alain de Botton argues that our romantic lives are shaped more by the emotional patterns we learned in childhood than... A collage shows an aerial view of a green planet above images of Indigenous people, some in traditional attire, participating in a gathering or march. Indigenous leadership is essential to climate action. Here’s why. At COP30, Indigenous leaders came with a message the world can’t ignore: 5% of the global population is safeguarding 80%... A man in glasses and a suit jacket sits indoors, gesturing with his right hand. Exposed brick walls, a window, and a lamp are visible in the background. The tiny transistors remaking our global order "The production of the silicon wafers that are used in the chip manufacturing process requires extraordinary levels of purity." Bald man wearing glasses and a peach shirt sits on a chair against a white background, gesturing with his left hand while talking. The biological necessity of boredom in the age of screens "I call it a tyranny of attention because there's so many demands on our attention coming from so many different... A group of people dressed in robes decorated with celestial symbols and wearing hats adorned with stars and crescent moons, drawn in a vintage illustration style on a yellow background. We may find alien life, but will we be able to accept the consequences? Military satellite research brought us GPS. Astronomers influenced medical imaging tech. What would be invented after we discover alien life?...
  • Columns Back Columns MINI PHILOSOPHY with Jonny Thomson" text on black background with icons of pathways, scales, and a bird. Mini Philosophy A philosophy column for personal reflection. X-ray galactic center Starts With A Bang An astrophysics column on big questions and our universe. A black background with the symbols "B | T" in a box on the left and the word "BOOKS" on the right, with the first "O" replaced by an open book icon. Books A literature column to feed your curiosity. Abstract image featuring a human silhouette filled with various medical and neural diagrams, with brain scan images in the background. A small figure is walking towards the center, symbolizing the long game. The Long Game A business column on long-term thinking. Strange Maps A geography column on history and society. The Well A collection of essays and videos on life’s biggest questions. 13.8 A column at the intersection of science and culture.
  • Classes Back Featured Classes A Venn diagram with three overlapping circles showing a person's face, a handshake, and a waveform on a green background. Members 5 videos The Humanity of Leadership Simon Sinek Ethnographer and author A collage featuring climbers helping each other, a pink compass rose, and a smiling man in a suit, all with a muted color palette. Members 7 videos How to Lead With Integrity Steve Stoute Founder and CEO, UnitedMasters and Translation A grayscale photo of a woman with hoop earrings, set against an orange background and overlaid on a black and white abstract digital pattern. Members 6 videos Transform Your Organization with AI Daphne Koller Founder and CEO of insitro. A bald man wearing a dark blazer and black shirt smiles slightly against a plain light gray background. Members 10 videos Unlocking Your Team’s Hidden Potential Adam Grant Organizational psychologist and author A four-panel image: a serving tray, a key symbol, a smiley face, and a smiling man in the bottom right corner. The colors are muted purple and beige. Members 6 videos The Secrets of Unreasonable Hospitality Will Guidara Restaurateur and Author, Unreasonable Hospitality A red-tinted image of a woman’s face is overlaid inside the shape of a purse, set against a black and yellow grid background. Members 12 videos How to Afford Anything Paula Pant Host, Afford Anything Podcast, Afford Anything
  • My Account Back
    • My Classes
    • My Account
    • My List
    • Early Releases
    • Sign Out
  • Sign In
  • Membership
  • More Back
    • Newsletters
    • Monthly Issues
    • Events
    • Big Think+ Learning
    • Creative Studio
    • Advertise with Us
    • About
    • Careers
    • View our Twitter (X) feed View our Youtube channel View our Instagram feed View our Substack feed
View our Twitter (X) feed View our Youtube channel View our Instagram feed View our Substack feed Search What are you curious about? Popular SearchesCritical thinkingPhilosophyEmotional IntelligenceFree Will Latest Videos Latest Articles The hidden cost of letting AI make your life easier

Philosopher Sven Nyholm on reclaiming achievement from the machines.

by Shai Tubali February 26, 2026 A robotic hand places a black stone on a Go board, surrounded by scattered black and white stones. Credit: BH007 / phonlamaiphoto / Adobe Stock / Sarah Soryal Key Takeaways
  • AI is increasingly able to perform complex tasks that once required significant human effort and ingenuity. 
  • This may save us time while ultimately diminishing our sense of achievement, which is closely linked to our sense of meaning, says Sven Nyholm, a Professor of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich.
  • The problem isn’t necessarily what AI produces, but rather what we stop developing in ourselves.
    PhilosophyArtificial IntelligenceAutomationAi EthicsTechnology

Sven Nyholm already sees troubling signs among his students. As a Professor of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, he’s noticed that many can’t be bothered to engage with demanding texts when an AI summary is just seconds away. “AI is designed to make people not think,” he tells Big Think. “But why study philosophy at university if you don’t want to think — if you don’t want to sharpen your critical abilities — and instead outsource them to a mindless AI program?” In these moments, he admits, both his students’ studies and his own role as a teacher feel less meaningful.

Nyholm has spent years contemplating where all this might be heading. As one of the earliest philosophers to examine how AI intersects with meaning in human life, he looks closely at the language big tech companies use to describe their AI goals. When companies like OpenAI or Google DeepMind say they aim to ensure that their AI products “benefit,” “transform,” or “improve” people’s lives, what vision of the good is being assumed? What is asked in return? 

For Nyholm, the deeper question is: Can AI improve our lives in the way that matters most — by deepening meaning — or might it diminish meaning in ways that remain largely unexamined?

“I don’t think that AI can be said to either be good or bad for meaning,” Nyholm says. He begins from a basic observation: Meaning is a complex idea, and we first need to be clear about what we mean when we speak of it. If meaning were entirely subjective, then whatever feels meaningful to someone would simply count as meaningful, and the discussion would end there. 

To take the question seriously, meaning has to be tied to criteria or practices that can be weighed and compared. Some ways of acting, creating, or relating can reasonably be said to carry more meaning than others. From there, another insight follows. Meaning is not a single achievement that settles everything once and for all: It spreads across different scales and moments. “It is not that there’s just one thing that’s meaningful, and if you do it, your life is meaningful, and if you don’t, your life is meaningless,” Nyholm says. We can ask whether reading an article like this is a meaningful way to spend an afternoon, whether a week carries meaning, whether a relationship with one’s parents does, and how all of this bears on the meaning of a life as a whole.  

How, then, do we judge meaning? Philosophy, Sven Nyholm points out, has developed a rich repertoire of criteria. One well-known strand links meaning in life to the good, the true, and the beautiful. On this account, a meaningful life is one shaped by doing good, seeking truth, and having the capacity to enjoy and appreciate beauty in its many expressions. Meaning has also been explored through what Nyholm describes as “developing the better sides of human nature, while learning to handle its less flattering aspects with dignity and care.”

Other perspectives locate meaning in being part of something larger than oneself. This can involve living in ways that reach beyond personal concerns, contributing to the good of others, forming deep relationships, and belonging to a community. These elements often gather around ideas of purpose, contribution, and achievement. Think of long-term projects that allow for progress over time, the cultivation of skills, and participation in communities of peers who recognize one another’s efforts and accomplishments.

Only once we have a grasp on what counts as meaningful activity can the central question take clearer shape: Is AI amplifying these domains, or undermining them? Nyholm draws the contrast with precision. “If AI takes over the meaningful ones and leaves us with only the activities and things that we find meaningless,” he argues, “then of course AI is by definition a threat to meaningfulness. Whereas if we can have AI take over the meaningless things from us, leaving the meaningful activities and things for us, then AI is a booster of meaning.” Everything hinges, then, on which tasks are being handed over, whether those tasks carry meaning for us, and whether there are other forms of activity left for human engagement.

This is where the terrain becomes unstable. Our familiar ideas about living well and acting virtuously were shaped long before AI began pressing against the boundaries of human life. They assume opportunities for contribution, for doing good, for achievement, and for the exercise of human ingenuity. Those assumptions may no longer hold in the world now unfolding. Even today, Nyholm notes, generative AI is opening a meaning gap: activities once experienced as meaningful are outsourced, while nothing equivalent takes their place.

The future of (meaningless) work

Nyholm gives the “gappy” character of generative AI a concrete face in his lucid and comprehensive book The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: A Philosophical Introduction. He invites us back to the much-discussed moment of 2016, when the computer program AlphaGo, trained through millions of games against itself, defeated the Go world champion Lee Sedol in four out of five matches. The story is usually told as either a technological watershed or a human fall, echoed in Lee Sedol’s later admission that playing Go had lost its meaning for him. Nyholm, however, looks elsewhere. 

He directs attention to a marginal yet indispensable figure: the Google DeepMind employee seated beside the board, manually placing stones for a machine with no arms. This person did not understand AlphaGo’s strategies. He did not need to be a skilled Go player, and perhaps did not even fully grasp the rules of the game. He was never regarded as the new world champion, and no one credits him with even a fraction of the achievement. So who, in fact, won? The engineers behind AlphaGo, absent from the games themselves? The system alone? Or, unsettlingly, no one at all?

Nyholm sees the 2016 jolt that shook our sense of achievement as only the tremor before a larger quake. In a world with ever more AI, he suggests, increasing numbers of people may end up in roles resembling the Google DeepMind employee: carrying out tasks whose intelligence lies elsewhere. Would such work offer achievements one could genuinely feel proud of? Since work is, for many, a central source of meaning in life, this prospect already threatens the availability of meaningful human activity.

Nyholm argues that the danger is already at work. He calls it a special case of the meaning gap: the achievement gap. It surfaces whenever we rely on AI to perform tasks we would otherwise carry out ourselves, tasks that normally exercise our intelligence and skill, such as writing text, composing music, and making decisions. 

When we do so, Nyholm warns, we end up “limiting our own contributions to outcomes.” As our role diminishes, the resulting products increasingly fail to qualify as achievements we can genuinely claim. In this sphere of meaningful achievement, Nyholm insists, the stakes are clear: Unless we actively resist this drift, something essential to the meaning of human life will be lost.

Who took that photograph?

One striking example of the achievement gap appeared early in the era of generative AI. In 2023, the Sony World Photography Competition awarded artist Boris Eldagsen first prize for best black-and-white photograph. The image, curiously titled The Electrician, depicted two women in an enigmatic embrace, rendered in the style of an old-fashioned print. The moment of celebration did not last. Eldagsen declined the award and disclosed that the image was not a photograph, but a work co-produced with generative AI. With notable humility, he argued that anyone relying on image-generating AI deserves no credit for being a good photographer, or even for being a photographer at all. At most, he suggested, the proper label would be “promptographer.”

At first glance, this incident can look like a narrow ethical puzzle about credit and authorship, something that might be settled by regulation or by inventing a new category such as “promptcraft.” Nyholm thinks the issue runs deeper — what’s really at stake is meaning. “Do we just care about the outputs someone produces with whatever tools are available?” he asks. With certain values, he suggests, the answer is clearly no. What matters is not exhausted by the finished product. We also attend to how it came about.

When we praise someone’s work, we usually care about who actually did it. We ask whether the person possesses the skills that made the achievement possible. Nyholm gives a simple example. If you want to know whether someone can write poetry, and you discover that they asked a large language model to produce a poem and then signed their name, you learn nothing about their ability. The poem itself might be impressive. It could even win a prize. Still, something crucial is missing. 

“If you don’t have to put in the work,” Nyholm says, “if you can just push a button and something good comes out,” the situation becomes strange. Perhaps the outcome is valuable and even adds something meaningful to the world. And yet, paradoxically, it may be that neither the AI system nor the human involved really understands what is being done.

To sharpen the point, Nyholm proposes turning John Searle’s famous Chinese Room against ourselves. In 1980, Searle imagined a human being sealed in a room, producing flawless replies in Chinese by following a rulebook, without understanding a word. To those outside, the performance looks intelligent; inside, comprehension never arises. Searle used this image to illuminate how a computer program can manipulate symbols without grasping meaning.

Nyholm keeps the human in the room but shifts the lesson. Imagine that same person now receiving Chinese messages, feeding them into a ChatGPT-like system through prompts, and passing the replies back out. The scene resembles the Go assistant executing AlphaGo’s moves or the creator of an AI-generated photograph. Intelligence is performed, yet understanding is absent. In relying on such systems without reflection, Nyholm suggests, the allegory no longer describes machines. It describes us.

“So did someone do something in a meaningful and admirable way,” Nyholm asks, “so that the outcome truly counts as their achievement?” Only then, he suggests, can we say of a piece of art or a corporate policy: You were the architect behind this; you showed judgment, skill, and accomplishment. “The more you didn’t actually do anything,” he adds, “and you had AI do it for you, the harder it becomes to say, ‘I am the cause. I am the origin. I deserve the credit.’”

Nyholm points to familiar cases. Think of a novelist leaning heavily on a ghostwriter, or a political leader delivering a stirring speech written entirely by staff. Now replace the ghostwriter or speechwriter with AI. “At that point,” he suggests, “you might have to say that no one really deserves credit.” We admire AI as an engineering achievement, he explains, yet we do not treat it as accomplished in the human sense. Effort, skill, and authorship remain categories we reserve for people, not for technologies.

Many philosophers, Nyholm observes, connect meaning closely to effort and achievement. One distinction he finds especially illuminating comes from political theorist Rob Goodman: the difference between “process goods” and “outcome goods.” Outcome goods are the finished results of activity, a completed text, a painting, a research finding. Process goods lie in the doing itself: painting, researching, struggling through a problem. These, Nyholm suggests, are precisely what AI threatens most. Much of what makes achievement meaningful is found in the process of achieving.

Inspired by philosophers such as Gwen Bradford and Hannah Maslen, Nyholm adds that genuine achievement involves difficulty and sacrifice. It also requires competence. The person must produce the outcome through skills they actually possess, showing a form of excellence. “Relying on AI technologies that tell us what to do,” he stresses, “or that help us produce impressive outputs, seems insufficient to qualify as having made extra effort, shown particular talent, or displayed any special form of excellence.”

The unbearable lightness of AI

Generative AI does not erode meaningful achievement by accident. It does so by design, and in line with its business logic. “It is designed to take over tasks that are effortful for us,” Nyholm says. “This is the very idea of AI: the temptation to take the easy way out.” The difficulty, he adds, is that many effortful tasks are precisely the ones that carry meaning. Deep relationships require patience, friction, and vulnerability. Skills demand time, frustration, and persistence. Yet people increasingly say: My AI companion is always available, always supportive, and far easier than dealing with another human being. Or instead of struggling to develop a skill, I can let AI produce the outcome for me.

In such cases, the praise AI attracts is telling. We call it convenient, time-saving, and cheap. “But is it meaningful?” Nyholm asks. When effort, creativity, and skill fall away, meaningfulness no longer seems the right category.

His deeper worry is not that AI will outperform humans, but that it will appear to do so, especially to non-expert eyes. “Current forms of AI threaten meaningful activities,” he argues, “because they look far more intelligent than they are.” This appearance invites trust. People begin to treat AI as an oracle, mistaking an impressive engineering achievement for understanding. As misplaced confidence grows, judgment weakens. Skills develop less fully. Capacities are handed over too easily, and with them, forms of meaning that depend on effort.

Nyholm links this directly to the value of processes, including confusion, detours, and lingering with complexity. He punctures the idea that everything should be fast and efficient. Speed may feel pleasant, he concedes, yet it undermines patient thinking and reconsideration. He points to an Anthropic advertisement promising a paper completed in a single day: brainstorming in the morning, drafting by noon, polishing by afternoon. What disappears in this vision is the slow work of searching, getting lost, following the wrong thread, and returning with insight. “Many ideas,” Nyholm says, “come from looking for one thing and finding something else instead.” When AI delivers tidy, unified answers, it spares us that work. In doing so, it risks weakening our capacity to break complex problems into parts, examine assumptions, and think things through with precision.

Nyholm is careful to say that how we preserve critical and analytical thinking, along with deep concentration, remains an open question. What worries him is the alternative: a gradual slide into lives shaped by impulse, short attention, and constant distraction. This challenge, he insists, cannot be placed on individuals alone. Public policy matters. Still, at the personal level, each of us has work to do. Nyholm speaks of finding an “AI and meaning sweet spot” — a way of living with technological assistance that still leaves room to contribute, play an active role in one’s community, and stay with difficult things long enough to actually understand them.

Above all, Nyholm pushes back against a seductive illusion. AI summaries and tidy three-point answers may free up time — perhaps, he adds wryly, for watching more TikTok videos — but they do not produce mastery. They can create the appearance of learning without its substance. When people later face situations that demand real judgment, they discover the gap. Excellence, Nyholm reminds us, grows from effort. He recalls an anecdote about violinist Itzhak Perlman. Told, “I would give my life to play like you,” Perlman replied, “I did give my life to play like I do.” Talent helps. What truly distinguishes people is time, practice, and enduring commitment.

    PhilosophyArtificial IntelligenceAutomationAi EthicsTechnology
Shai Tubali Full Profile A person with short hair wearing a light-colored shirt is smiling slightly while standing indoors. Monthly Issue February 2026 Biology’s New Era In this monthly issue, we explore the bleeding edge of biotech, as well as the scientists, writers, and philosophers whose efforts helped get us here. 1 video 10 articles Abstract collage of human profiles, DNA sequences, cell patterns, molecular structures, and geometric shapes on an orange background.

Related Content

Books

Your life, scored: How metrics warp your sense of meaning

What’s in a number? Only a vanishingly small slice of your life, it turns out.

by Kevin Dickinson A set of large blue numbers from 1 to 9, with the number 2 in bold red and black scribbles drawn over it. Science & Tech

We still don’t understand human cell behavior. That’s about to change.

By treating the human body as an information system, scientists are using AI to simulate cells, visualize hidden biology, and detect disease at its earliest — and most preventable — stages.

Presented By Biohub by Lee Helland A 3D model of a green fluorescent protein (GFP) structure, showing beta sheets and an outer transparent molecular surface against a black background. Science & Tech

How to deter biothreats in the age of gene synthesis

From global DNA screening standards to safeguards for benchtop synthesizers and AI tools, a new biosecurity playbook is taking shape.

by Jen Kirby An illustration of a padlock with one half depicting a DNA strand and the other half showing a green circuit board pattern, symbolizing biodefense, set against a pink background. Science & Tech

Athletes keep breaking records — and they may never stop

Technology, shifting rules, and human ambition push athletes beyond biology’s perceived limits.

by Alex Hutchinson simple collage of runner Learn from the world's biggest thinkers.
  • Videos
    • Latest
    • The Big Think Interview
  • Columns
    • Mini Philosophy
    • Starts with a Bang
    • Big Think Books
    • The Long Game
    • Strange Maps
    • 13.8
    • The Well
    • Rethinking Possible
  • Sections
    • Philosophy
    • Mind & Behavior
    • Science & Tech
    • Business
    • History & Society
  • Classes
    • Class Library
  • Subscribe
    • Membership
    • Free Newsletters
  • Partner
    • Big Think+ Learning
    • Creative Studio
    • Advertise with Us
    • Events
  • More
    • About
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Sale
    • Accessibility
View our Twitter (X) feed View our Youtube channel View our Instagram feed View our Substack feed © Copyright 2007-2026 & BIG THINK, BIG THINK PLUS, SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by Freethink Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Related Articles